The one stop information shop for
all your interests in law. This website is now offering £25 for the best story sent to
us every week, which will be published.
VIDEO
From Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur: Menard in Canada
An examination of de facto power, TASER usage, obstruction of
justice and our remedy against a growing police state.
Macmillan & Co
89, High St
Alness Ross-Shire IV17 0SH
Tel: 01349 883338
MacPhail Murdoch & Co
12 High St
Dingwall Ross-Shire IV15 9RU
Tel: 01349 864588
Our Constitution is made up of a lot of documents that are within Common Law
and Statute Law.
1. Magna Carta 1215/25
2. Treason Act 1351
3. Act of Supremacy 1534
4. Declaration of Rights 1689
5. Bill of Rights 1689
6. Treason and Felony Act 1848
JUST SAY NO
People only need to start saying 'NO' - that's it.
No to political parties, no to leaders
just personal responsibility under Common Law.
Police have been given the
go-ahead to use Taser stun guns against children. The relaxing of
restrictions on the use of the weapons comes despite warnings that they
could trigger a heart attack in youngsters. The Government scientists
were also asked to test whether the weapons could cause a miscarriage
if used on a pregnant woman.
~~~~~
The body count in North American now stands at 287 after having been tasered
with this "less than lethal" device. 15 Canadians and 272 Americans since
2001, 9 dead in August of this year alone.
~~~~~~~
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84
Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was a plan by the
United States federal government to test their ability to detain large
numbers of American citizens in case of civil unrest or national emergency.
Much has been made of the Act of Parliament
regarding 42 days detention but no mention has been made of the
Clause inserted in this Act which allows the dismissal of a coroner
and a jury, presumably if they don’t like what is happening.
This was debated in the House of Commons and both sides of the House
were against it. Why has this not been given any publicity as this
is far more serious than the 42 days of detention?
A. F. G. Rundle, Orpington Kent
Mr Rundle made one small mistake in as much as there are actually
two clauses, and not one They are to be found under Part 6 of this
legislation:
Clause 77: Certificate requiring inquest to be held without a jury:
England and Wales
Some one recently asked me
the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?
Rebellion in itself has a number of
different meanings and is in fact quite close to another
word that seems to be on everyone’s lips; Revolution.
Defined meaning of Rebellion;
Refusal to accept some authority or code
or convention.
An act or show of defiance toward an
authority or established government.
Defined meaning of Lawful;
Being within the law; allowed by law:
lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful refusal
to conform to the authority that is unjust)
Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the
founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to
enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed
unjustly. Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her
government are only there to govern us and not to rule us
and this must be done within the constraint of our Common
Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can
become law in this country if it falls outside of this
simple constraint.
Article 61 shows quite clearly who really
holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us
the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor
can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to
have taken the people’s Sovereignty. As defined above any
act passed by a Parliament to remove the power the people
possess, or to remove the power from the point of constraint
we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls outside of
the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.
This is a simple safeguard put in place to
protect our freedoms under said law and to never allow such
freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in reality any Act,
Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by these
actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite
evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.
By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly
stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and
after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40 day’s to
correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply
enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full
protection of our Constitutional Law.
Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for the
following recourse;
Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax,
Fines and any other forms of monies to support and/or
benefit said unlawful governance of this country.
Full refusal to abide by any Law,
Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in
place by said unlawful governance that is in breech of
the Constitutional safeguard.
To hinder in any way possible all
actions of the treasonous government of this land, who
have breeched the Constitutional safeguard; defined with
no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance
under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article
61.
Above are listed the three main ways we can
as a people rely upon article 61 and what this allows for.
The British people were given over 700 years ago a Law to
use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary
dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right,
which amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a
birth right at that, to be governed properly under our birth
right law and no other and certainly not by laws introduced
on the pretence of being British Law, when in fact all laws
passed since 1973 have been European laws in the guise of
British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law
and no Parliament can remove this for they were not present
in its implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any
Parliament involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck
between the people and a Sovereign, a deal which can never
be broken.
The traitors that reside in the Parliament
of this country only fear one thing and that quite simply is
us the people and they know that they can never defend
themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and
deceit against the power of the people, asserted by and
given by, the founding document of our Constitution Magna
Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do, that once the
British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both hands
and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite
simply up.
What does Magna Carta stand for?
In stands for freedom, that the people have
Sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone and it stands
for the only real true rule of law; that no one, without
exception, is above the law.
What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion)
stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.
The philosophy of
liberty is based on self-ownership. This simple but elegant and hard-hitting
animation will explain exactly what that means. It's a great tool anyone can
use to educate children and adults about our right to life, liberty, and the
property we create - and our responsibility to think, speak and act.
Dream Home - Broadband enabled
Legislation is based on
admiralty law and not common law and as such is contract law and
can only be enforced through consent.
By entering into lawful rebellion one breaks no law because he
is in common law jurisdiction and paying taxes is an admiralty
enforced legislation.
FICTIONS: Members, both men and women sit in "official"
positions under the 3rd party (corporate-person) tiles of
lawyer, barrister, magistrate, judge, senator, minister,
executive, treasurer, detective, chairman, bureaucrat, public
servant, governor, director, councillor, etc etc, hundreds of
3rd party titles. And thus "The Crown", centered in a tiny 1km
square piece of land known as "The City Of London" within
greater London city, oversees its "Legalised", "Corporatised"
(persons - masonic-soldiers) New World Order agenda like a
General overlooking the (global) battle from a high hill.
Incremental totalitarianism
implemented through
institutionalised compartmentalisation
Dream Home - Broadband
enabled
The Common Law which applies to all living souls is: We are
free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on the
life, liberty, property, or rights of another.
Some interesting presentation by David-Sidney: Rideout...
"Interview with Mary Elizabeth Croft on credit,
contract and the 'person'" [MP3],
and her book [PDF]
Mark McMurtrie...
"Lessons in Law" - parts
1,
2 &
3 (2
hours 7 mins)
"An Australian Sovereign - British Legal Scam" -
parts 1,
2 &
3 (2
hours 21 mins)
Statutes, acts, by-laws and codes are rules drawn up by a
corporation, such as the Crown, that are given the force of the law,
but they only apply to its employees, partners and executives. The
law, or more accurately, Common Law,
or the law of the land, has been constructed to protect all blessed
living souls on Planet Earth.
We are all at liberty to act
according to our own free will, provided we do not infringe the
ability of others to do the same. In other words, as long as we
don’t infringe the the rights to life, liberty and property of
another blessed living soul, no judge has the legal authority to
order us to do anything, including appear in a de facto court.
9th Jan 2009 the EU Reform Treaty comes into affect, what that
does, is puts the European constitution into affect, which wipes out
the British constitution.
The government wont tell you about this though, its all part of
there disinformation campaign.
But what this means is, it will abolish the British as a nation
completely. You won’t be British you will be European!
on the 5th of May 2010 Parliament will close, as that is when there
current term expires, and under the EU constitution which is what we
will be under that day, there is no way that a new Parliament can be
elected, that means no British government at all, you will be ruled
by the EU, which if you look at who founded the EU are ex Nazis,
don’t believe me????
Check it out for yourselves.
http://freespeech.freeblogit.com/your-future-in-the-uk/
Ephesians 6:12 King James Bible
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against
principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness
of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
The unwritten body of universal moral principles that
underlie the ethical and legal norms by which human conduct is sometimes
evaluated and governed. Natural law is often contrasted with positive law,
which consists of the written rules and regulations enacted by government.
The term natural law is derived from the Roman term jus naturale.
Adherents to natural law philosophy are known as naturalists.
Article 25
of the Rome Statute and sections 51 and 52 of the International
Criminal Court Act 2001 not only place criminal responsibility for
the deaths caused by war on the Monarch, the Prime Minister, members
of the Cabinet, senior civil servants, MPs and the military
commanders responsible for commissioning acts of war; but equally
place criminal responsibility on the servicemen and women, arms
manufacturers, suppliers and taxpayers who aid, abet, incite or
facilitate the commission of these crimes. No longer can
individuals evade joint responsibility for crimes committed by our
political leaders.
All
military personnel, taxpayers and ordinary citizens who support,
obey or condone the orders of their government or Parliament to
wage aggressive war in which people are killed, are not only
criminally liable for a crime against peace under the Nuremburg
Principles, but under this new legislation they become
accessories to the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity
and war crimes and render themselves liable to prosecution in
Britain or The Hague.
www.notmygovernment.us
"Governments are created by men. Men are not created by
governments. Governments are of right, or de jure. Or not
of right, or de facto as illustrated above. Man is
naturally endowed with indivisible rights and responsibilities.
His status is defined by the exercise of those rights and
responsibilities. As he is governed by good conscience and right
reason he lives in a state of self government called freedom.
The whole truth of that State of Freedom defines the status
of the man, free or in bondage."
Do not murder or harm another, do not steal, do
not damage another's property and do not commit fraud in your
contracts.
illegal 1) adj. in violation
of statute, regulation or ordinance, which may be criminal or merely
not in conformity. Thus, an armed robbery is illegal, and so is an
access road which is narrower than the county allows, but the
violation is not criminal. 2) a person residing in a country of
which he/she is not a citizen and who has no official permission to
be there.
unlawful adj. referring to
any action which is in violation of a statute, federal or state
constitution, or established legal precedents (against the law).
By definition, a 'person' is a legal-fiction
or legal-entity created on paper for acting
under a constructed jurisdiction - a closed set of rules and
regulations.
A human being - man (incl. woman) - is
NOT a 'person', but a human being HAS a 'person', in the same
way he or she HAS an ID.
It is this 'person', also known by other means;
the 'Citizen', 'Driver', 'Resident', 'Non-Resident' etc. that
acts under the laws of the incorporated society.
The human being may disassociate from the
'person' if he/she so chooses, as long as the human being has
power of attorney, signs for the 'person' as an agent and does
not understand (stand under) the 'person'.
It is the 'person' who's name is written in
ALL-CAPITALS that is operated in commerce and all crimes on this
entity are commercial crimes (though it doesn't
necessarily have to be written in all-capitals if the Subject
Matter Jurisdiction is clear).
The seminar above by David Sidney Rideout is very
good, but I also recommend these introductory seminars by various
people to get a good grounding in the subject. Each with their own
angle and way of presenting...
Sir William
Blackstone was a renowned English jurist who wrote the highly
influential work called, "Commentaries on the Laws of England "
He was the third most quoted source, behind the Bible, and I
believe, John Locke, whom our Founding Fathers cited as the
basis for law in America.
Blackstone defined the laws of nature and of nature's God as,
"Man, considered as a creature, must necessarily be subject to
the laws of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent being
... And, consequently, as man depends absolutely upon his Maker
for everything, it is necessary that he should in all points
conform to his Maker's will ... this will of his Maker is called
the law of nature. These laws laid down by God are the eternal
immutable laws of good and evil. This law of nature dictated by
God Himself; is of course superior in obligation to any other.
It is binding over the entire globe, in all countries, and at
all times: no human laws are of any validity if contrary to
this... The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or
divine law, and they are to be found in the Holy Scriptures ...
{and} are found upon comparison to be really part of the
original law of nature. Upon these two foundations, the law of
nature and the law of revelation depend all human laws; that is
to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these."
Learn about your rights and duties as
free & sovereign human beings - vs - the 'Acts',
'Statutes', 'Rules', 'Regulations' & 'By-Laws' that act on the
legal-fiction known as your 'person' - i.e. the 'Citizen'.
Preliminaries...
By definition, a 'person' is a legal-fiction
or legal-entity created on paper for acting
under a constructed jurisdiction - a closed set of rules and
regulations.
A human being is NOT a 'person', but a human
being HAS a 'person', in the same way he or she HAS an ID.
It is this 'person', also known by other means;
the 'Citizen', 'Driver', 'Resident' etc. that acts
within the laws of the incorporated society.
See these introductory seminars to freedom and the
Common Law...
Press Conference, Room
C, 1 Parliament Street Tuesday 15th January 2008 3pm John McDonnell
MP, Chris Coverdale: International War Law Expert and Annie Machon
of the Campaign to Make War History brief MPs and the media on
allegations of war crimes committed against the people of Iraq by
Britain's former Prime Minister and former Attorney General.
All members of the SCOTTISH LABOUR PARTY are GUILTY of supporting
genocide, crimes
against humanity, war crimes and conduct ancillary to these crimes
under Sections 51 and 52 of The International Criminal Court Act
2001. • a crime against peace and complicity in a crime against
peace under Articles 6 and 7 of The Nuremburg Principles. • murder,
incitement to murder and conspiracy to murder under the Offences
Against the Person Act 1861. • conspiracy to commit genocide, a
crime against humanity and war crimes under the Criminal Law Act
1977.
And so long as governments are not perceived by the people to steal
too much, or to be excessively violent, most people will tolerate
them in exchange for protection from outside conquest which they
fear might be more severe. The only difference between a modern
government and a mafia-style protection-racket, is its size and
scope. For its authority, government does not rely upon
law,
but upon its perceived capacity to do violence in exchange for
noncompliance.
The Common Law which applies to all living souls is: We are
free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on the
life, liberty, property, or rights of another.
“Truth needs no laws to support it.
Throughout history, from Giordano Bruno and Galileo, to
Ernst Zundel
and
David Irving, only lies and liars
have resorted to the courts to enforce adherence to dogma.” [Michael
Rivero]
Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers
Made up of people from all walks of society, we have all, at one time or
another, been victims of deep-rooted corruption in the legal profession.
Are you
suffering from:
Sciatica, Back Ache, Muscle & joint pain,
Trapped nerve, Neck & Shoulder pain. Tennis
Elbow. With no end to the pain.
Try Infrared Whole Body Heat Therapy.
5 day Therapy 30min. sessions £20
each.
NO Medication. open 8-8 . 7 days . .
Appointments only.
Tel: Ann 01349-866407
Kilcoy, Tore www.infrared-therapy.co.uk
Please bring 1 small & 1 large towel.
This my friends, this wretched-looking, inside out faced behemoth is
none other than our glorious leader…E.U President Herman Von Rompuy.
Handsome specimen isn’t he.
Now notice how I called him ‘glorious’, I used that word as that is
how most dictators like to be known. He is a dictator. Unelected. No
system of democracy put him into office. No votes by the populace, no
consent by the governed.
This man is your enemy, he wants your freedom, he wants your nation, he wants your obedience. He recently quoted….
The time of the homogenous nation-state is over… The national and the European interest can no longer be separated; they coincide… We have together to fight the danger of a new Euro-scepticism. This is no longer the monopoly of a few countries. In every Member State, there are people who believe their country can survive alone in the globalised world. It is more than an illusion: it is a lie!
Deciphered…….”Your country is now mine, and you will be punished if you speak out”.
Speak out? Yes. To speak out against the EU is now a crime according
to various blogs and newspapers, add to that…..it being a crime to speak
out against muslims….a crime to speak out against gays….a crime to
refuse to self-incriminate…..a crime to buy herbal remedies from a
unlicensed supplier….the list is endless.
You see non-crimes like these raise revenue for him and his
sidekicks, add to that the 48 million pounds that Britain pays to the EU
each and every single day……did you hear that??? Every fucking day!! We
are told to tighten our belts whilst they dine on Caviar and Oysters.
Handsome Herman personally pockets £320.000 a year plus a £4 million budget for travel expenses…….cunt.
So technically we the tax-payers fund “Adolf” here, to tell us that
we can no longer be ‘English’ or ‘Scottish’ or ‘Welsh’. How does that
make you feel?…………………………………
Know your enemy people, remember his face..(it’s not difficult)
I am off to burn some EU flags, shout my mouth off and be totally un-politically correct.