The one stop information shop for
all your interests in law. This website is now offering £25 for the best story sent to
us every week, which will be published.
Craig Wood
24 Union St
Inverness
IV1 1PL
T 01463 225544
Our Constitution is made up of a lot of
documents that are within Common Law and Statute Law.
1. Magna Carta 1215/25
2. Treason Act 1351
3. Act of Supremacy 1534
4. Declaration of Rights 1689
5. Bill of Rights 1689
6. Treason and Felony Act 1848
Cowan Douglas Law 11-12 Queensgate Business Centre, Fraser Street
Inverness IV1 1DW : 01463 243120 Fax 01463
243 183
Crown Law Practice
3 Crown Circus
Inverness
IV2 3NH
T 01463 667850
Davidson Scott & Co
11 Queensgate
Inverness
IV1 1DF
T 01463 231066
VIDEO
From Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur: Menard in Canada
An examination of de facto power, TASER usage, obstruction of
justice and our remedy against a growing police state.
Police have been given the go-ahead to use Taser stun guns
against children. The relaxing of restrictions on the use of the weapons
comes despite warnings that they could trigger a heart attack in youngsters.
The Government scientists were also asked to test whether the weapons could
cause a miscarriage if used on a pregnant woman.
~~~~~
The body count in North American now stands at 287 after having been tasered
with this "less than lethal" device. 15 Canadians and 272 Americans since
2001, 9 dead in August of this year alone.
~~~~~~~
Much has been made of the Act of Parliament
regarding 42 days detention but no mention has been made of the
Clause inserted in this Act which allows the dismissal of a coroner
and a jury, presumably if they don’t like what is happening.
This was debated in the House of Commons and both sides of the House
were against it. Why has this not been given any publicity as this
is far more serious than the 42 days of detention?
A. F. G. Rundle, Orpington Kent
Mr Rundle made one small mistake in as much as there are actually
two clauses, and not one They are to be found under Part 6 of this
legislation:
Clause 77: Certificate requiring inquest to be held without a jury:
England and Wales
MacAndrew & Jenkins
5 Drummond St
Inverness
IV1 1QF
T 01463 723500
MacArthur & Co
7 Ardross St
Inverness
IV3 5PL
T 01463 234445
MacArthur Stewart
6a Stephens Brae
Inverness
IV2 3JN
T 01463 243434
Ken MacDonald Lawyers
9 Kenneth Street, Stornoway, Isle of Lewis HS1 2DP
enquiries@kenmacdonaldlawyers.co.uk
MacDonald Maciver & Co
112 Academy St
Inverness
IV1 1LX
T 01463 713232
MacKenzie Law Practice, The
24 Union St
Inverness
IV1 1PL
T 01463 713718
The Common Law which applies to all living souls is: We
are free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on
the life, liberty, property, or rights of another.
Macleod and MacCallum
28 Queensgate, Inverness, IV1 1YN
Tel : 01463 239393 Property Dept: 01463 235559
By Fax: +44 (0)1463 222879 Property Dept Fax: +44 (0)1463 224629
mail@macandmac.co.uk
Macleod & Mclurg W.S
13 Lombard St
Inverness
IV1 1QQ
T 01463 242222
The philosophy of
liberty is based on self-ownership. This simple but elegant and hard-hitting
animation will explain exactly what that means. It's a great tool anyone can
use to educate children and adults about our right to life, liberty, and the
property we create - and our responsibility to think, speak and act.
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things
have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at
night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return
alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods
of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a
quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their
lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at
every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing
left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush
of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else
was at hand? [...] The Organs would very quickly have suffered a
shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of
Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"
-Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago (Chapter 1
"Arrest")
Legislation is based on admiralty law and not
common law and as such is contract law and can only be enforced
through consent.
By entering into lawful rebellion one breaks no law because he is in
common law jurisdiction and paying taxes is an admiralty enforced
legislation.
Some interesting presentation by David-Sidney: Rideout...
"Interview with Mary Elizabeth Croft on credit,
contract and the 'person'" [MP3],
and her book [PDF]
Mark McMurtrie...
"Lessons in Law" - parts
1,
2 &
3 (2
hours 7 mins)
"An Australian Sovereign - British Legal Scam" -
parts 1,
2 &
3 (2
hours 21 mins)
Statutes, acts, by-laws and codes are rules drawn up by a
corporation, such as the Crown, that are given the force of the law,
but they only apply to its employees, partners and executives. The
law, or more accurately, Common Law,
or the law of the land, has been constructed to protect all blessed
living souls on Planet Earth.
We are all at liberty to act
according to our own free will, provided we do not infringe the
ability of others to do the same. In other words, as long as we
don’t infringe the the rights to life, liberty and property of
another blessed living soul, no judge has the legal authority to
order us to do anything, including appear in a de facto court.
"It is not the strongest species that survive, nor the
most intelligent,
but the ones most responsive to change." - Charles Darwin
http://loveforlife.com.au/
Men and women who are the cogs in the Global, National and Domestic
networks of "The Crown". Members of this masonic cabal, both men and
women sit in "official" positions under the 3rd party
(corporate-person) tiles of lawyer, barrister, magistrate, judge,
senator, minister, executive, treasurer, detective, chairman,
bureaucrat, public servant, governor, director, etc etc, hundreds of
3rd party titles. And thus "The Crown", centered in a tiny 1km
square piece of land known as "The City Of London" within greater
London city, oversees its "Legalised", "Corporatised" (persons -
masonic-soldiers) New World Order agenda like a General overlooking
the (global) battle from a high hill.
The unwritten body of universal moral principles that
underlie the ethical and legal norms by which human conduct is sometimes
evaluated and governed. Natural law is often contrasted with positive law,
which consists of the written rules and regulations enacted by government.
The term natural law is derived from the Roman term jus naturale.
Adherents to natural law philosophy are known as naturalists.
Article
25 of the Rome Statute and sections 51 and 52 of the
International Criminal Court Act 2001 not only place criminal
responsibility for the deaths caused by war on the Monarch, the
Prime Minister, members of the Cabinet, senior civil servants,
MPs and the military commanders responsible for commissioning
acts of war; but equally place criminal responsibility on the
servicemen and women, arms manufacturers, suppliers and
taxpayers who aid, abet, incite or facilitate the commission of
these crimes. No longer can individuals evade joint
responsibility for crimes committed by our political leaders.
All
military personnel, taxpayers and ordinary citizens who support,
obey or condone the orders of their government or Parliament to
wage aggressive war in which people are killed, are not only
criminally liable for a crime against peace under the Nuremburg
Principles, but under this new legislation they become
accessories to the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity
and war crimes and render themselves liable to prosecution in
Britain or The Hague.
www.notmygovernment.us
"Governments are created by men. Men are not created by
governments. Governments are of right, or de jure. Or not
of right, or de facto as illustrated above. Man is
naturally endowed with indivisible rights and responsibilities.
His status is defined by the exercise of those rights and
responsibilities. As he is governed by good conscience and right
reason he lives in a state of self government called freedom.
The whole truth of that State of Freedom defines the status
of the man, free or in bondage."
Do not murder or harm another, do not steal, do not damage
another's property and do not commit fraud in your contracts.
illegal 1) adj. in violation
of statute, regulation or ordinance, which may be criminal or merely
not in conformity. Thus, an armed robbery is illegal, and so is an
access road which is narrower than the county allows, but the
violation is not criminal. 2) a person residing in a country of
which he/she is not a citizen and who has no official permission to
be there.
unlawful adj. referring to
any action which is in violation of a statute, federal or state
constitution, or established legal precedents (against the law).
Sir William Blackstone was a renowned English jurist who wrote the
highly influential work called, "Commentaries on the Laws of England "
He was the third most quoted source, behind the Bible, and I
believe, John Locke, whom our Founding Fathers cited as the basis
for law in America.
Blackstone
defined the laws of nature and of nature's God as,
"Man, considered as a creature, must necessarily be subject to the
laws of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent being ... And,
consequently, as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for
everything, it is necessary that he should in all points conform to
his Maker's will ... this will of his Maker is called the law of
nature. These laws laid down by God are the eternal immutable laws
of good and evil. This law of nature dictated by God Himself; is of
course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over the
entire globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are
of any validity if contrary to this... The doctrines thus delivered
we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found in the
Holy Scriptures ... {and} are found upon comparison to be really
part of the original law of nature. Upon these two foundations, the
law of nature and the law of revelation depend all human laws; that
is to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these."
By definition, a 'person' is a legal-fiction or
legal-entity created on paper for acting under a
constructed jurisdiction - a closed set of rules and regulations.
A human being - man (incl. woman) - is NOT a
'person', but a human being HAS a 'person', in the same way he or she
HAS an ID.
It is this 'person', also known by other means; the
'Citizen', 'Driver', 'Resident', 'Non-Resident' etc. that acts
under the laws of the incorporated society.
The human being may disassociate from the 'person' if
he/she so chooses, as long as the human being has power of attorney,
signs for the 'person' as an agent and does not understand (stand under)
the 'person'.
It is the 'person' who's name is written in ALL-CAPITALS
that is operated in commerce and all crimes on this entity are
commercial crimes (though it doesn't necessarily have to be written in
all-capitals if the Subject Matter Jurisdiction is clear).
The seminar above by David Sidney Rideout is very good, but
I also recommend these introductory seminars by various people to get a good
grounding in the subject. Each with their own angle and way of presenting...
Learn about your rights and duties as
free & sovereign human beings - vs - the 'Acts',
'Statutes', 'Rules', 'Regulations' & 'By-Laws' that act on the
legal-fiction known as your 'person' - i.e. the 'Citizen'.
Preliminaries...
By definition, a 'person' is a legal-fiction
or legal-entity created on paper for acting
under a constructed jurisdiction - a closed set of rules and
regulations.
A human being is NOT a 'person', but a human
being HAS a 'person', in the same way he or she HAS an ID.
It is this 'person', also known by other means;
the 'Citizen', 'Driver', 'Resident' etc. that acts
within the laws of the incorporated society.
[Person: In general usage, a human being (ie natural
person – itself an oxymoron), though by statute term may include a
firm, labour organisations, partnerships, associations,
corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in
bankruptcy, or receivers. National Labour Relations Act, S 2(1),
Black’s 8th Ed P1178 ]
See these introductory seminars to freedom and the
Common Law...
All members of the SCOTTISH LABOUR PARTY are GUILTY of supporting
genocide, crimes
against humanity, war crimes and conduct ancillary to these crimes
under Sections 51 and 52 of The International Criminal Court Act
2001. • a crime against peace and complicity in a crime against
peace under Articles 6 and 7 of The Nuremburg Principles. • murder,
incitement to murder and conspiracy to murder under the Offences
Against the Person Act 1861. • conspiracy to commit genocide, a
crime against humanity and war crimes under the Criminal Law Act
1977.
And so long as governments are not perceived by the people to steal
too much, or to be excessively violent, most people will tolerate
them in exchange for protection from outside conquest which they
fear might be more severe. The only difference between a modern
government and a mafia-style protection-racket, is its size and
scope. For its authority, government does not rely upon
law,
but upon its perceived capacity to do violence in exchange for
non-compliance.
Woe Unto Lawyers
Work explaining the true nature of lawyers as modern
witch-doctors who exploit humanity for their own gain.
Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers
Made up of people from all walks of society, we have all, at one time or
another, been victims of deep-rooted corruption in the legal profession.
Are you
suffering from:
Sciatica, Back Ache, Muscle & joint pain,
Trapped nerve, Neck & Shoulder pain. Tennis
Elbow. With no end to the pain.
Try Infrared Whole Body Heat Therapy.
5 day Therapy 30min. sessions £20
each.
NO Medication. open 8-8 . 7 days . .
Appointments only.
Tel: Ann 01349-866407
Kilcoy, Tore www.infrared-therapy.co.uk
Please bring 1 small & 1 large towel.
Truth needs no law to support it.
Throughout history, from Galileo to Bruno to Zundel, only lies and
liars have resorted to the courts to enforce adherence to dogma.
Some one recently asked me the
question; what is Lawful Rebellion?
Rebellion in itself has a number of different
meanings and is in fact quite close to another word that seems
to be on everyone’s lips; Revolution. Defined meaning of
Rebellion;
Refusal to accept some authority or code or
convention.
An act or show of defiance toward an
authority or established government.
Defined meaning of Lawful;
Being within the law; allowed by law:
lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful refusal to
conform to the authority that is unjust)
Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the
founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter
into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly.
Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are
only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done
within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms
asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this
country if it falls outside of this simple constraint.
Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds
the power in this country, that being quite simply us the
people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this
be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the
people’s Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a
Parliament to remove the power the people possess, or to remove
the power from the point of constraint we invested the power in,
is invalid as it falls outside of the constraint laid down by
Common/Constitutional Law.
This is a simple safeguard put in place to
protect our freedoms under said law and to never allow such
freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in reality any Act,
Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by these
actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite
evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.
By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly
stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and after
giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40 day’s to correct this,
if this is not corrected, then we can simply enter into lawful
rebellion and we do this under the full protection of our
Constitutional Law.
Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for the
following recourse;
Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines
and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said
unlawful governance of this country.
Full refusal to abide by any Law,
Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place
by said unlawful governance that is in breech of the
Constitutional safeguard.
To hinder in any way possible all actions of
the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched
the Constitutional safeguard; defined with no form of
violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under freedom
asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61.
Above are listed the three main ways we can as a
people rely upon article 61 and what this allows for. The
British people were given over 700 years ago a Law to use as
there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary
dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right,
which amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth
right at that, to be governed properly under our birth right law
and no other and certainly not by laws introduced on the
pretence of being British Law, when in fact all laws passed
since 1973 have been European laws in the guise of British law.
We have a right to freedom within our true law and no Parliament
can remove this for they were not present in its implementation
nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament involvement,
this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a
Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.
The traitors that reside in the Parliament of
this country only fear one thing and that quite simply is us the
people and they know that they can never defend themselves, or
defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against the
power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding
document of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as
many others do, that once the British public grasps the power of
Magna Carta in both hands and start to use it in their defense;
their game is quite simply up.
What does Magna Carta stand for?
In stands for freedom, that the people have
Sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone and it stands for
the only real true rule of law; that no one, without exception,
is above the law.
What does Article 61 (Lawful Rebellion) stand
for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.
This my friends, this wretched-looking, inside out faced behemoth is
none other than our glorious leader…E.U President Herman Von Rompuy.
Handsome specimen isn’t he.
Now notice how I called him ‘glorious’, I used that word as that is
how most dictators like to be known. He is a dictator. Unelected. No
system of democracy put him into office. No votes by the populace, no
consent by the governed.
This man is your enemy, he wants your freedom, he wants your nation, he wants your obedience. He recently quoted….
The time of the homogenous nation-state is over… The national and the European interest can no longer be separated; they coincide… We have together to fight the danger of a new Euro-scepticism. This is no longer the monopoly of a few countries. In every Member State, there are people who believe their country can survive alone in the globalised world. It is more than an illusion: it is a lie!
Deciphered…….”Your country is now mine, and you will be punished if you speak out”.
Speak out? Yes. To speak out against the EU is now a crime according
to various blogs and newspapers, add to that…..it being a crime to speak
out against muslims….a crime to speak out against gays….a crime to
refuse to self-incriminate…..a crime to buy herbal remedies from a
unlicensed supplier….the list is endless.
You see non-crimes like these raise revenue for him and his
sidekicks, add to that the 48 million pounds that Britain pays to the EU
each and every single day……did you hear that??? Every fucking day!! We
are told to tighten our belts whilst they dine on Caviar and Oysters.
Handsome Herman personally pockets £320.000 a year plus a £4 million budget for travel expenses…….cunt.
So technically we the tax-payers fund “Adolf” here, to tell us that
we can no longer be ‘English’ or ‘Scottish’ or ‘Welsh’. How does that
make you feel?…………………………………
Know your enemy people, remember his face..(it’s not difficult)
I am off to burn some EU flags, shout my mouth off and be totally un-politically correct.